My thoughts about Sony and Fuji

i specifically meant Fuji XT2 and SONY A6500. The latter is, in my opinion, worse when it comes to color, albeit not too significant; despite having the advantage of better color reproduction, or more neutral colors, the actual color depth isn’t quite there when compared with the XT2. A main reason why i favored XT2 is because of weight, ironically, sińce the XT2 is heavier. A heavier camera, as I’ve mentioned before, means better stability as long as Sony’s image stabilization can’t be used. Other than that, i thought that the Sony isn’t as aesthetically pleasing to me, though in ergonomic terms is a better choice because of the deeper grip and smaller size. Medium and large lenses on the A6500 don’t look quite right as it has to do with aesthetics. On the other side, you could probably get over that after some time using the Sony. For video, Sony is almost certainly better as it can do internal log profile, and as for 1080p video, can do two Times faster frame rate. Okay, I may admit, i have to some extent regretted choosing the XT2, mainly because for being about the same price, but there’s another aspect, the fact that the XT2 has dual card slots and better overall weather sealing. The Sony can take lots of images in rapid succesion, but for most purposes i wouldn’t worry much about that, since the additional number of images per second that are possible with Sony is only arguably better, at about 3 frames per second faster. I think that the buffer is most likely of more importance than the fps, but i forget which one comes out with better buffer capacity. The main reason why i like the dual card slots in the XT2 is because i can put more memory in it. Oh, and don't forget, Sony is thought to make the best sensors, although in practice, Fuji doesn't really fail much if at all in sensor technology, as Fuji employed the X-Trans.